JILICC RTP Explained — What the Percentage Means

RTP (return to player): Given as a percentage, this is the long-run share of all wagers that a game hands back to players.

RTP at a glance
FactValue
TermRTP
Short forreturn to player
Set byWhichever studio builds the game sets it at that stage
Where you meet itGame spec tables and studio info panels
Not the same asA guarantee, a payout schedule, a measure of how often a game pays: RTP is none of these. Games returning 96% by way of rare enormous wins and by way of constant small ones share an identical rating but feel nothing alike. Volatility, the second property, has a number that is separate from the rest.

Most pages that use the term RTP take for granted that the reader already knows what it means. This one does not.

RTP (return to player) — Given as a percentage, this is the long-run share of all wagers that a game hands back to players.

What RTP actually means

FieldValue
TermRTP
Written outreturn to player
In one lineGiven as a percentage, this is the long-run share of all wagers that a game hands back to players.
Fixed byWhichever studio builds the game sets it at that stage
Where you meet itGame spec tables and studio info panels

No session is guaranteed anything by RTP, which is a trait of the game’s mathematics. The 96% RTP figure means the game is designed to return 96 units for every 100 wagered, with the very large number of spins required being millions, not hundreds. The remaining 4 is the house edge. Set by the studio at the point the game is built, it is on most games beyond the offering casino’s ability to alter.

A worked example

The arithmetic is worth doing once. At a 96% RTP, an expected ₱4,800 comes back from ₱5,000 of turnover (500 spins at ₱10), so the player expects to lose ₱200. Because 500 spins is such a tiny sample, the actual result will fall widely around that figure, and the spread is wider still on high-volatility titles. The expectation is not a forecast but the distribution’s centre.

The common misreading

Most misreadings of a 96% RTP run the same way: the player expects 96% of their money back on an evening. It does not. Short-term results are driven by variance, with the long-run average needing a quantity of play that lies beyond any individual. Nothing about the accuracy of the figures follows from a player losing their whole stake on a 98% game or winning overall on a 94% one.

A guarantee, a payout schedule, a measure of how often a game pays: RTP is none of these. Games returning 96% by way of rare enormous wins and by way of constant small ones share an identical rating but feel nothing alike. Volatility, the second property, has a number that is separate from the rest.

Using it in practice

Between-game comparison is what RTP is for, so keep your own results out of the picture. Nobody sees a one-point RTP difference over a session, though across a catalogue it adds up to something meaningful. Sourcing is the other test: a studio that puts RTP on its own game pages can be quoted, but a figure that just recurs on comparison sites with no primary source cannot. Next to the house edge entry it is easier to take in, as those terms tend to appear together in the same set.

You will meet RTP and similar terms on game pages throughout this site; if a studio keeps the number behind one private, the page tells you so and does not borrow a figure from a comparison site. Blank cells in several of the spec tables on this page come down to exactly that.

Checking RTP at JILICC

  1. Open a game at JILICC and find its info or help screen.
  2. Search that section for RTP, and interpret it with the definition given earlier.
  3. Compare it with the same entry on another title before you pick one to play at JILICC.
  4. Write your stake and your stop point down before the first round at JILICC.

FAQ

What do people get wrong about RTP?

Most misreadings of a 96% RTP run the same way: the player expects 96% of their money back on an evening. It does not. Short-term results are driven by variance, with the long-run average needing a quantity of play that lies beyond any individual. Nothing about the accuracy of the figures follows from a player losing their whole stake on a 98% game or winning overall on a 94% one.

What is the best way to put RTP to work when you pick a game?

Between-game comparison is what RTP is for, so keep your own results out of the picture. Nobody sees a one-point RTP difference over a session, though across a catalogue it adds up to something meaningful. Sourcing is the other test: a studio that puts RTP on its own game pages can be quoted, but a figure that just recurs on comparison sites with no primary source cannot.

Is RTP something a casino can change?

Not on this site's evidence. A value tied to rtp comes out of the game's own mathematics, so the studio owns it and the operator does not; if the studio keeps it unpublished, nothing outside the studio can verify it.

Related terms defined here

Related terms defined here
GuideWhat it covers
House edgeThe mathematical advantage held by the operator, which is the figure that complements RTP arithmetically.

Heading over to JILICC?

Your account, your balance and every promotion are held by JILICC itself; this guide holds none of them.

RegisterLogin